<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bald Faced vs. Bold Faced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blueion.com/2008/09/23/bald-faced-vs-bold-faced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blueion.com/2008/09/23/bald-faced-vs-bold-faced/</link>
	<description>Life daily...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.blueion.com/2008/09/23/bald-faced-vs-bold-faced/comment-page-1/#comment-4986</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blueion.com/?p=1022#comment-4986</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Wayne too. Making up the etymology of a word is simple enough, I&#039;ve yet to see any credible source on which term was used first.

The idea that a &quot;bald-faced&quot; liar is more correct because people used it to mean that &quot;he can lie well without a beard&quot; is no better than the idea that &quot;bold-faced&quot; is right because it means &quot;lying boldly.&quot;

It seems that the idea with more (unsourced) google hits supporting it becomes the de-facto reality... and who wouldn&#039;t want to propagate a quaint etymology like &quot;bald-faced?&quot;

And eggcorn.com is a great example of a blog endorsing unproven etymologies. I just read on there about &quot;bran-new&quot; being an incorrect spelling of &quot;brand-new&quot; without a single source to back it up. Well I just finished reading Dickens&#039; Little Dorritt from 1857 and he uses &quot;bran-new.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Wayne too. Making up the etymology of a word is simple enough, I&#8217;ve yet to see any credible source on which term was used first.</p>
<p>The idea that a &#8220;bald-faced&#8221; liar is more correct because people used it to mean that &#8220;he can lie well without a beard&#8221; is no better than the idea that &#8220;bold-faced&#8221; is right because it means &#8220;lying boldly.&#8221;</p>
<p>It seems that the idea with more (unsourced) google hits supporting it becomes the de-facto reality&#8230; and who wouldn&#8217;t want to propagate a quaint etymology like &#8220;bald-faced?&#8221;</p>
<p>And eggcorn.com is a great example of a blog endorsing unproven etymologies. I just read on there about &#8220;bran-new&#8221; being an incorrect spelling of &#8220;brand-new&#8221; without a single source to back it up. Well I just finished reading Dickens&#8217; Little Dorritt from 1857 and he uses &#8220;bran-new.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://blog.blueion.com/2008/09/23/bald-faced-vs-bold-faced/comment-page-1/#comment-4513</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blueion.com/?p=1022#comment-4513</guid>
		<description>I think Wayne has it backwards. What is his source? I believe bold face is correct same as Robert says. I get it from reading old, gramically correct books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wayne has it backwards. What is his source? I believe bold face is correct same as Robert says. I get it from reading old, gramically correct books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blog.blueion.com/2008/09/23/bald-faced-vs-bold-faced/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blueion.com/?p=1022#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>The original phrase was &quot;bare-faced,&quot; which evolved into &quot;bald-faced.&quot;  The idea was that just as the beard can hide the face, a &quot;bald-faced lie&quot; was one that someone made no attempt to conceal.  In modern times, it has taken a further devolution into &quot;bold-faced,&quot; as some people have not been familiar with the phrase and took it to be similar to our current means of emphasizing something in print by putting it in &quot;bold-face&quot; type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original phrase was &#8220;bare-faced,&#8221; which evolved into &#8220;bald-faced.&#8221;  The idea was that just as the beard can hide the face, a &#8220;bald-faced lie&#8221; was one that someone made no attempt to conceal.  In modern times, it has taken a further devolution into &#8220;bold-faced,&#8221; as some people have not been familiar with the phrase and took it to be similar to our current means of emphasizing something in print by putting it in &#8220;bold-face&#8221; type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.blueion.com/2008/09/23/bald-faced-vs-bold-faced/comment-page-1/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blueion.com/?p=1022#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>they&#039;s wikipedians are bein&#039; just crazy. 
i learned all my speakin&#039; from the internet, and just look how good i is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;s wikipedians are bein&#8217; just crazy.<br />
i learned all my speakin&#8217; from the internet, and just look how good i is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

